final-project-website

Project Milestone Report (due Wednesday, April 19, 9:00am)

The milestone exists is to give you a deadline approximately halfway through the project. The following are suggestions for information to include in your milestone write-up. Your goal in the writeup is to assure the course staff (and yourself) that your project is proceeding as you said it would in your proposal. If it is not, your milestone writeup should emphasize what has been causing you problems, and provide an adjusted schedule and adjusted goals. As projects differ, not all items in the list below are relevant to all projects.

Project schedule

Make sure your project schedule on your main project page is up to date with work completed so far, and well as with a revised plan of work for the coming weeks. As by this time you should have a good understanding of what is required to complete your project, I want to see a very detailed schedule for the coming weeks. I suggest breaking time down into half-week increments. Each increment should have at least one task, and for each task put a person’s name on it.

Summarize the work that you have completed

Our milestone progress is primarily focused on implementing the sequential version of the minimum distance between mesh algorithm. We obtained a 3D mesh for a FANUC robot, and created the infrastructure of the project (reading and parsing OBJ file, reading user config file, placing models in a scene, etc). As for the sequential algorithm, we find the minimum distance between two or more meshes by calculating the distance for each pair of faces in the meshes. In this attempt, have the algorithm working on a toy example. However, we are still fixing some corner case bugs that occur when we run the algorithm on the actual object. In another approach, where we are trying to implement the GJK algorithm with minimum distance calculation, we are still halfway through.

Describe how you are doing with respect to the goals and deliverables stated in your proposal

In the proposal, we stated that we would implement the sequential version of the minimum distance between mesh algorithm and parallelize it using CUDA. Our goad has not changed, as we did find some opportunities in parallelizing the algorithm. For the naive serial implementation, we can parallelize the computation across the faces in the scece. For the GJK algorithm implementation, the minkowski sum of two meshes can be parallelized by calculating the sum of each vertex in the first mesh with each vertex in the second mesh. The support function in the second approach is also parallelizable for mesh. We also found that it would be interesting to see how the hill climbing optimization (which has to be sequential) would compare with the parallelized version of brute force approach. We do still believe we can produce all the deliverables. However, the “nice to haves” (integrating it with SSA) would be too much for us to do in the remaining time.

What do you plan to show at the poster session? Will it be a demo? Will it be a graph?

We expect to have a demo in which our program outputs the minimum distance bewteen meshes in a complex scene. This will likely be the command-line style demo (run the serial and parallel programs and observe that they take different times). The speedup plot will be presented.

List the issues that concern you the most

The issues we concern the most is the correctness of the algorithm. Even with the sequential version, we are already struggling with edges cases like division of 0 when the objects are extremely close. We belive this would be harder to debug in CUDA.